The Origin Of Turks

THE ORIGIN OF TURKS

THE TURKISH ROOTS…..

Extracts from the Book “The History of Turks” by JeanPaul Roux,

Director of research of the National Science Research Centre, Lecturer in the School of Louvre, and member of the Institute of Turkish Studies of Paris University.  

THE PROTO-TURKS

The roots of the first Turks are hidden in the depths of ages inside the woods of Siberia from where they migrated to Central Asia high lands.

Their presence among the Barbarians of the north who were surrounding China for centuries (The second and third millennium) cannot be identified or registered before the foundation of the first  large confederation of nomadic tribes which was made known as Confederation of Hiong-Nou. (200BC)

The tribes that constituted the confederation they belonged to various nationalities and language groups. Among these groups there was a large number of Proto-Turk tribes..

The centre of the Empire of Hiong-nou was in the north of Mongolia, the land of

“Otouken” a very important location of Strategic value, which will stay as a most sensitive part of the “Empires of High Lands” as various groupings of confederations of Turkish or Turkish speaking tribes were used to be called.

The Hiong –nou intermixed the peoples, they established the foundation of a nomadic civilization and contributed to a great extend to the dominance of Altaic tribes in all higher Asia.

The Hiong-Nou are attacking and expanding their territories both towards west as well as south, around 170 BC.

During this period we observe a lot of migrations and confrontations with other People, some of which were Proto Turks as well as other ancient People, i.e  Yioue-Tse and Vou-Souen, who were Proto-Turks.

It was these confrontations that resulted in the destruction of Vacteriani the famous Hellenistic Kingdom founded by Alexander the Great, during his last expedition..

The distraction of Vacteriani is characteristic of what followed the confrontations of the Nomadic tribes among themselves as well as with other most stable peoples that had developed ancient civilizations.

Of course the conflict with the Hellenistic Vactiriani was minimal compared with the conflict with larger China.

In order to destabilize their enemy (Hiong-Nou ) China managed to create internal fights as a result of which the Empire was split in two new Kingdoms, the Kingdom of North in North Mongolia  and the Kingdom of South in to day’s Interior Mongolia.

This split was the preannouncement of their destruction, nevertheless, the Hiong-Nou maintain  instability in China.

Before the end of the third century, the Barbarians, following the Hiong Nou are spreading all over North China. These are Turkish speaking tribes of the Tabgats who are descent from the lake of Vaicali.

During 422 they occupy the capital Lo-Yiang and under the name “Dynasty of Bei” they claim all China including  the Oasis of Central Asia.

During 534 the Dynasty of Bei is split, dispersed and thus disappears or more precisely is absorbed by China.

Of course 150 years of their domination in China was not with no political and military consequences.

In the moorings of Central Asia, which had been abandoned meanwhile, a new Nomadic Empire is established from the remaining Hiong Nou which include many Proto-Mongols called Avars. This new Empire is formed with the participation of  of Tambgats who were still acquainted with the life in the moorings and having still  considerable horse power they became independent and attached the Avars in the heart of their Empire the Land of Otouken.

Thus the Turkish tribes rise again  and prepare their future domination.

THE FIRST HISTORIC TURKS

The Mongolic and Siberian  Altaiκa mountains were the place from which the Turkish people originated. Among these people were the Tou-kue, a special branch of Hiong- Nou and among others the Toles

The Avars already weakened by the attacks launched by the Tambgats are expecting one more assault from the Toles who are seeking their independence.

The story says that Boumin the Chief of Tou-kue tribe is warning the Avars about the plan of Toles and their uprιsing fails.

Boumin requests as a prize for his services the hand of a Princes but he is refused and receives a most offending reply.

-Aren’t you the slaves who make our weapons in Altai?

Hence the Tou-kue join the Tambgats (Bei) against Avars. In the word Tou-Kue is hidden the word Turk (Tourouk) which means “Strong”.The Tourouks are the first Historic Turks.

It is said that the parental origin of  Tourouks starts from the family Boumin who were  descendants of the tribe of Hion-Nou which was eliminated except a ten year old boy which was mutilated but saved from a female wolf which later united with him and brought to the world ten children, one of these ten children was named Asina

The Name Asina is  the original name of the Tourouk dynasty. The Tourouks are the successors of Avars and secure the supremacy over all  Turkish speaking races which were tired from the Mongolian dominance.

The Turuks extend their rule in Mongolia to Russian Turkistan, a part of Chinese Turkistan, Afghanistan to India. The Empire is getting huge.

This first Turkish Empire was established among major military and cultural powers such as China, Iran, and the Greek Byzantines, at this time. The constant conflicts introduce the Turks into the great historical Civilizations.

The Turuks after their successes develop similar ambitions to the Greeks.

The Greeks have been in conflict with the Persians for centuries. Therefore they temporarily become Turuk allies.

But the Chinese are alert, at first panicked because of this new barbarian power, and invested in the rivalry between the northern and southern Turuks, thereby managing to create a conflict that later helps them regain their advantage in Central Asia.

Thus  the second Turkish empire was formed,  in the region of Otuken which achieved amazing results until 734 AD. The most important achievement was the reunification of all Turkic tribes and overthrew the Chinese occupation.

THE CONCURRENCE WITH THE ARABS

So, we arrive at the period of the Arab invasion. Mohamed died during 632 AC and the succeeding Caliphs had undertaken to concur the world.

The Byzantines and the Persians were totally exhausted from hundreds of years of fights but they were still the dominant powers in the area, even so, they could not respond to the challenges.

Thus, Arab and Turkish waves  phase each other in their efforts to expand, with same strength and vitality but on opposite directions. The Arabs are moving  East and the Turks are moving west.

On account of a shear coincidence they ally against the Chinese army  which they destroy (741AC).

So, in just one day, the fait of  Central Asia turn to  “Turkification” and Islam  instead of becoming Chinese, as things looked likely till then.

Persia had already collapsed.

The gigantic Arab wave towards East corresponded to the Turkish wave towards west. But the collusion did not create a turmoil. The two opposing powers although equally strong they were not of the same nature. One was totally spiritual and cultural and the other was purely military. Islam will give its religion and culture to the Turks while Turks will give their arms to the Arabs

History of Turks and Turkey   http://www.mfa.gov.tr/grupc/ca/cab/default.htm

The above link to a site, was the official reference from a site , published by the Turkish government. This page has been removed. See bellow a copy of the missing page.

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or1.jpgRepublic of Turkey

The Republic of Turkey, founded in 1923, has its roots in two historical sources deep in the depths of the past. One of these resources inherited by modern Turkey is the successful and shining history of the Turks over a time frame of more than 4,000 years. The other is the fact that Turks have been settled in Anatolia since the 11th century.

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or2.jpgThe Huns

The first Turkish tribe that is mentioned in history is the Huns. Clear records about the Huns made their appearance in the 8th century B.C. Chinese sources refer to the Huns as Hiung-nu and in time, some of the Huns migrated to the West.

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or3.jpgThe Gokturks

Founded in 552 AD by Bumin Khan, the Gokturks engaged in widespread diplomatic activity. The famed Orhun epitaphs from this period are made up of the tombstone inscriptions of Tonyukuk (d.720), Kültigin (d.731) and Bilge Kagan (d.734)

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or4.jpgThe Uygurs

The rule of the Göktürks was brought to an end in the year 745 by the Uygurs, who were of the same ethnic stock as themselves. In this manner all the Turks who had converged under the banner of the Göktürks were dispersed to that of the Uygurs that the agricultural basin where they lived became known as Turkistan. In the year 1229, the Mongols put an end to Uygur sovereignty; the Uygurs however, became their cultural and political mentors.

The Turks and Islam

Contacts between the Turks and Moslems commenced at the beginning of the 8th century and some of the Turks began to favour Islam. However the pro-Arab policies of the Omayads (661-750 A.D) restricted these relations somewhat. Later, many Moslem Turks took office in the Abbside government and because of this, great interest in the Islamic world spread among the Turks beyond the River Ceyhun. Commercial caravans also played a major role in the spread of Islam into the steppes of Central Asia. The Turks became fully Moslem by the 10th century, and this resulted in the achievement to political unity. Following these developments, the first Moslem Turkish state was formed by the Karahans.

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or5.jpgThe Karahans

The Karahans ruled between 990-1212 in Turkistan and Maveraünnehir. The reign of the Karahans is especially significant from the point of view of Turkish culture and art history. It is during this period that mosques, schools, bridges and caravansarays were constructed in the cities. Buhara and Samarkand became centres of learning. In the period, the Turkish language found the means to develop. Among the most important works of the period is Kutadgu Bilik (translated as “The Knowledge That Gives Happiness”) written by Yusuf Has Hacib, between the years 1069-1070.

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or6.jpgThe Ghaznavids

The Ghaznavi state was formed in the year 963 by the Turkish ruler Sevuktekin and is one of the first Moslem Turkish states and worked relentlessly for the expansion of Islam in India. The Ghaznavids finally collapsed in 1186 and were assimilated by the Oguz.
The Turkish scholar Ebu Reyhan el-Beyruni makes this period an important one within Islamic cultural history and wrote the famed work by the poet Firdevsi, the ?ehname, was also written in this period (A.D. 1009)

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or7.jpgThe Seljuks

The O?uz, who destroyed the Ghaznavid state, succeeded in bringing Anatolia, Iraq, the southern part of the Caucasus, Azerbaijan and the north of Iran under Turkish rule. The O?uz had first formed the Göktürk Empire in the 6th century; after the expansion of Islam among the Turks, but among the Turks the Oguz came to be called the Turkmens.

Tu?rul Bey and Ça?ry (Çakyr) Bey were the grandsons of Seljuks whose name the Seljuks Dynasty adopted. In their time they, and the O?uz, known as the Seljuks in history, subdued Horasan, defeated the Ghaznavid ruler Mesud in Dandanakan Battle and established the Great Seljuk empire in 1040.

In 1071, Alp Arslan (1063-1072) fought the battle of Malazgirt and having defeated the Byzantine Emperor’s forces in this battle opened the doors of Anatolia to the Moslem Turk.

The year 1071 is considered to be the beginning of the Turks and that of Islam Anatolia. It is following this date that the Turks fully conquered the whole of Anatolia and established the Anatolian Seljuk state there as a part of the great Seljuk Empire.

The first schooling institutions, the Moslem theological medreses, were formed in Anatolia during the time of Kylyç Arslan (1153-1192), one in Konya and the other in Aksaray. Following the establishment of these two medreses the medreses of Syrcaly in Konya (1242-1243), Karatay (1251), Ynce Minareli (1251-1253), Atabekkiye (after 1251-1268), Gökmedrese in Sivas (1271), Buruciye (1271-1272), Çifte Minareli (1271), and the Cacoglu in Kirsehir (1272) were established.

The Seljuks also attributed much importance to the medical sciences and in almost all their cities medical institutions called Darush-Shifa, Darul-Afiye and Darus-Sihna and hospitals were set up. The main medical treatment centres are the Gevher Nesibe in Kayseri (1205), the Izzettin I Keykavus in Sivas (1217), the Torumtay in Amasya (1266), the Muinuddin Pervane in Tokat (1275) and the Pervaneoglu Ali in Kastamonu (1272).

Because of the Persian influence coming from Iran among the intellectuals, the administrators, the men of arts and the traders, the Anatolian Seljuk state became increasingly affected by Iranian culture and language.

The Beyliks

The Period Principalities

Political unity in Anatolia was disrupted from the time of the collapse of the Anatolia Seljuk State at the beginning of the 14th century (1308), when until the beginning of the 16th century each of the regions in the country fell under the domination of Beyliks (Principalities). Eventually, the Ottoman Principality which destroyed all the other Principalities and restored political unity in Anatolia, was established in the Eski?ehir, Bilecik and Bursa areas.

On the other hand, the area in central Anatolia east of the Ankara-Aksaray line as far as the area of Erzurum remained under the administration of the Ilhani General Governor until 1336. The infighting in Ilhan gave the principalities in Anatolia their complete independence. In addition to this, new Turkish principalities were formed in the localities previously under Ilhan occupation.

During the 14th century, the Turkomans, who made up the western Turks, started to re-establish their previous political sovereignty in the Islamic world.

Rapid developments in the Turkish language and culture toot place during the time of the Anatolia Principalities. In this period, the Turkish language began to be used in the sciences and in literature, and became the official language of the Principalities. New medreses were established and progress was made in the medical sciences during this period.

Gül?ehri, Nesimi (d.1404) and ahmedi (1325-1412) are the prominent Turkish language poets of the 15th century.

https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or8.jpgThe Ottomans

The Ottoman Principality was founded by a Turkoman tribe living on the Turkish-Byzantine border. The geographic location of the principality and the weak state of the Byzantines combined to make the Ottoman principality the strongest state within the Islamic world by the 14th century.

When Fatih Sultah Mehmet II. conguered the Byzantine capital in 1453, the Ottoman state became the strongest of the time. The tolerant approach taken by Fatih Sultan Mehmet II toward other religions and to the adherents thereof became a tradition accepted by his successors. Following the capture of Istanbul, the Orthodox Church was freed from obedience to the Catholic Church and granted its independence.https://nickkouzos.com/images/The%20or9.jpg

On the other hand, the technical superiority of the Ottoman army began to be evident during the reign of Selim I. The Ottomans have added, in addition to the major part of east Anatolia, the lands considered holy in the Islamic world-Mecca and Medine and their territories.

The brightest period of the Ottoman State was during the reign of Sultan Suleyman (1520-1555) when the boundaries of the Empire spread from the outskirts of Vienna to the Persian Gulf and from the Crimea to an expanded north Africa as far as Ethiopia.

The Ottoman empire continued to acquire territory until the middle of the 17th century. In 1683, it suffered its first major defeat in the siege of Vienna.

As the losses of land and sought continued, the Ottoman Empire sought salvation in a series of reform movements and established education institutions taking after the western institutions which had shown great developments after the Renaissance.

The declaration of the “Tanzimat” Reform movement in 1839 is considered a major link in the chain of modernization events which had continued unabated since the beginning of the 17th century.

The Tanzimat Decree is considered to be a kind of constitution which gave Turkey the means to enter road to contemporary civilization.

The principles inherent in the Tanzimat Reform Decree thereby laid the basis for the constitutional regime of modern Turkey and the realization of secularism.

Despite many internal problems and disturbances during the reign of Abdülaziz (1861-1876) the effects of westernization in society became even more evident. Namyk Kemal, Ziya Pasha, Mustafa Fazyl Pasha and his friends published the newspaper “Hürriyet” (Freedom) in London in the year 1864. The literary themes of the newspaper later gave way to political issues. Although it is because of these trends that the first constitution was promulgated under the leadership of Mithat Pasha in 1876, Sultan Abdülhamid II (1876-1909) used the Ottoman-Russian war (1877-78) as an excuse to dissolve Parliament and effectively put an end to this constitutional period. The Ottoman empire entered the First World War in 1914 on the side of the allied powers.

The Ottoman State emerged defeated from the war, together with its allies, and was compelled to sign the Mudrow Armistice on October 30, 1918. Also among the terms of the armistice was a provision that the occupying powers might occupy areas deemed to be of strategic importance; the powers started therefore to occupy Anatolia on November 1, 1918 according to these terms.

On May 15, 1919, the Greeks occupied Yzmir. A national resistance movement commenced. In many areas of the country the Society For Defence of Rights (Müdafaa-i Hukuk) started to spring up, and the military arm of the society, called the Kuvayi Milliye. Started to take action.

The resistance movement was, until Mustafa Kemal landed at Samsun, sporadic and disorganized; under his leadership the resistance became cohesive, its forces progressively turned into an organized army and the movement became a full scale war of independence.

More Info about Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and National War of Independence

The Turkish nation took shape in the centuries of Seljuk and Ottoman power.

The official position of the Turkish state today claims that the nomadic Turkish conquerors did not displace the original local inhabitants: Hellenized Anatolians (or simply Greeks), Armenians, people of Caucasian origins, Kurds, and – in the Balkans – Slavs, Albanians and others. This may be true for the early centuries after the collapse of the Byzantines (1453) but certainly is not true for 1800’s and 1900’s.

Consider happenings before and after the 1st world war with Armenian, Assyrian and Greek populations.

In spite of this the official Turkish position is that the Turkish population  intermarried with people of other cultures, while many local people converted to Islam and ‘turned Turk’. They were joined by Muslims from the lands north of the Black Sea and the Caucasus, by Persian craftsmen and Arab scholars, and by European adventurers and converts, known in the West as renegades. As a result, the Turks today exhibit a wide variety of ethnic types. Some have delicate Far Eastern, others heavy local Anatolian features, some, who are descended from Slavs, Albanians or Circassians, have light complexions, others are dark-skinned, many look Mediterranean, others Central Asian or Persian.

At this point is worth referring to a book written by an independent source, the ambassador of US in Constantinople during the 1st world war “Ambassador’s Morgenthau’s story”  see link:

 http://www.archive.org/stream/ambassadormorgen00morguoft#page/346/mode/2up

H. Morgenthau

Ambassador’s Morgenthau’s story. Heath W. Lowrey The Isis Press Istambul 1990.

Extract from Eukipedia with relevant links

Anatolia has been an important center of interaction, for many peoples and their cultures, throughout the known human history. This dynamic constitute a highly diverse culture and also a significant  heterogeneity  of peoples. The migrations of  Turkic  speaking groups in Anatolia is a dramatic shift in language barrier between  Altaic languages  and  Indo-European languages . The nature of this  language shift  has been subject to considerable scholarly debate. Some  Turkish  scholars, mostly with  political  prejudices, claimed that this transition happened through a nearly complete replacement of the  indigenous populations  in Anatolian with Turkic-speaking groups[ citation needed ]. Other scholars, including Turkish, based on  genetic  data, claimed that the transition happened through  elite   dominance , a model suggesting Turkification, i.e.  cultural assimilation , without significant genetic contribution. These models, however, are only tested by simplistic and general surveys of contemporary Turkish population, without historical considerations. Therefore it is difficult to understand the complex cultural and  demographic  dynamics of the Turkic speaking groups that have shaped the Anatolian landscape for the last millennium. [5]  The region of the  Anatolia  represents an extremely important area with respect to ancient population migration and expansion. During  antiquity   Anatolia  was a cradle for a wide variety of numerous indigenous peoples as  ArmeniansAssyriansHattians , HittitesHellenesPelasgiansPhrygiansThraciansMedes  and others.

 

Although the origin of Turkish people is important to appreciate why and how they managed to invade and survive among two ancient civilizations, such as the Chinese and Hellenistic ones, at a period after the fall of Rome, when other barbaric tribes, from the North west and North East, were attacking, the same area that Byzantines were defending, it is equally important to understand why and how Turks managed to adapt to new conditions, and adopt local cultures.

It is generally accepted that nomadic tribes, after capturing certain areas and after stabilizing their coexistence with local agricultural, indigenous populations, they acquire common local cultural characteristics with the preexisting civilizations.

Hence it was also natural that Turkish tribes acquired cultural characteristics from Persian, Arabic and Hellenic indigenous populations.

From Persia, Turks acquired some social characteristics, from Arabs they acquired religion and from Greeks acquired trading, commercial and everyday life characteristics.

Turks offered to the local people their fighting competences and military protection

In addition, Turks intermingled, as it was inevitable, to mix genetically over the years and acquire physical characteristics with the various different populations.

The Greek influence was so great, due to social and cultural power derived from higher population numbers preexisting in Asia Minor.

It is only the religious differences among Islam and Christianity as well as the language and culture that helped some Greek populations to maintain their national identity.

It is worth mentioning that most Turkish Sultans used to merry Christian Greek wives who taught future Sultans Greek language and Greek culture.

The Turkish administration used to employ Greeks as translators in courts of justice as well as public administrators, in some cases they were even using Greeks as supervisors in countries they were occupying, to reduce reactions to Ottoman administration.

Greeks were also proved valuable to the Ottomans for their trade with Western countries and Russia.

This practice eventually made Greek populations to become major middle class in Asia Minor, during the years of the Ottoman Empire.

Yet many thousands of Christians were converted to Islam either to maintain a higher social status, or to avoid higher tax rates that the Ottomans were applying to Christians.

Turks believe that they were very gracious and generous towards Greeks and Armenians, during the Ottoman Empire, and they had created an ideal society to benefit everybody, under Ottoman administration. They believe they have created a common culture, better than the western culture which was based on colonialism.

They fail to understand that Turkey was equally exploiting, as colonialists, the countries they occupied. They fail to understand that the worst type of exploitation is to deprive their Ottoman subjects of their national identity and social and economic status.

Turks still believe they have the right to own Ottoman territories, in spite the fact, that they lost during the 1st World War and Turkey was created, as a modern state, on the bases of international treaties signed by many nations.

Turkey believes that Greece was a traitorous internal enemy that sided with western powers to break up its Empire. Turks don’t understand that the Greek population of Asia Minor was the homeland of millions Greeks who deserved a piece of Asia Minor. It was natural for any nation to try and defend its homeland.

Even now, that Asia Minor Greeks, who have lost their homeland and have accepted the fact that they have lost, and are trying to maintain the position  of a looser, Turkey wants to revise Greece’s frontiers, in land, sea and air depriving its rights, under the treaties and international law.

They continue to behave like the victors of the 1st World War and gloss over what they had and lost as the Ottoman Empire under the pretext of modernizing international treaties and international legislation that has been  signed, since then.

The fact that she did not sign the ‘international law of the sea’ does not mean that this law does not apply, also her insistence on disarming the islands of the Eastern Aegean and questioning the ownership status is completely pretentious because Turkey is not threatened by the islands , the Aegean has simply turned into a strait for international shipping.

A video produced byTurkish saurces describing the historical milrstones, year per year  the conquering of central Asia and the Balkans. Naturaly thr video doew not explain what happened to local indigenus populations.

file:///F:/Personal/VIDEOS/The%20History%20of%20Turkey%20%20Every%20Year.mp4

 

24/04/2013

CONFESSION OF A TURKISH JOURNALIST REGARDING THE FILM “ALOSI 1453”

Another record for the most expensive film production in Turkish history.

Five million Turks have seen it

The film super production “The fall of Constantinople 1453”

The Turkish film “The Fall of 1453” sets a box office record. By the end of the third week of screening in Turkish cinemas, it is estimated that 5,042,994 viewers have already rushed to the cinemas to watch the story.

For the completion of the film, more than 17 million dollars were spent and it took almost three years of shooting and editing. The film presents the life of Sultan Muhammad up to the time of the Ottoman invasion of Constantinople on Tuesday, May 29, 1453, which coincides with the 560th anniversary of the capture of Vasilevousa.

The Turkish blockbuster has also caused criticism from within. Indicative is what the journalist Burak Bechdil wrote in February in the English-language edition of Hurriet, who posed the rhetorical question of whether the British celebrated the “fall of London” or the Germans the “fall of Berlin”.

“Do we have to wait for films like “Extermination 1974” or “Extermination of 1915″ to follow?” the Turkish journalist was indirectly mocking his compatriots.

The confession of a thinking Turk journalist

With an impressively honest article, published in the authoritative newspaper SABAH, by Engin Ardiç, a well-known writer and journalist in Turkey, the Turkish way of celebrating the fall of Istanbul on May 29 is described…

In this article, the author presents a series of truths that the Kemal regime has been trying to suppress for decades. It is worth quoting the full text, translated from the specific address of the Turkish newspaper Sabah, which reads as follows: “Turkish compatriots, stop the fanfare and celebrations for the extermination, we have given enough peace to the East with our actions…”

IF a conference was organized in Athens with the theme: “We will take back the City”…

IF they made a model of the city walls and the soldiers in their armor attacking the City… (like we in Turkey do every year!)

IF a guy dressed like the famous Greek victor and almost mythical Digenis Akritas caught our own Ulubatli Hasan and knocked him down…

IF someone suddenly entered the city dressed as Emperor Constantine on a white horse and next to him another as Loukas Notaras, as George Frantzis and they entered as representatives of the city… (as we in Turkey do every year!)

IF they made a paper Hagia Sophia that had no minarets but a Cross….

IF they burned incense and sang hymns, would we like it?

We would not like it, we would stir up the people, until we would call back our ambassador from Greece.

Then why do you do this, every year?

It’s been 556 years and you’re celebrating (the Fall) like it was yesterday?

Because every year at such a time, (with these celebrations you do) you proclaim to the whole world that:

“These parts were not ours; we came later and took them with us”.

Why are you bringing up a case of 6 centuries?

Is there a subconscious fear that the City will one day be given back?

Fear not, there is no such thing as some Ergenekon idiots say about 1919 terms.

Do not be afraid, the 9 million Greeks cannot take the city of 12 million, and even if they take it they cannot inhabit it.

 

And our people who celebrate the Fall are just a handful of fanatics, even their voices are hard to hear.

Gentlemen, if they tell us that we plundered the City for three days and three nights continuously, what will we answer?

Will we defend ourselves in the European Court of Human Rights or will we leave the matter to the historians?

Instead of taking pride in the cities we have conquered, let us take pride in those we have founded, if they exist. But they don’t exist.

The entire East is a territory conquered by force…

Even the name of Anatolia is not what they believe (ana=mother, dolu=full) but comes from the Greek word “East”. “Anatoli”

Even the name of Istanbul is not, as Ebliya Celebi tells us, “Where Islam prevails”, but comes from Greek. “Is tin poli”

Okay, so we got a permanent settlement, the nomadic life is over and that’s why the people buy five-by-five apartments. Nobody can move us, calm down now…

Let our villagers be content with murdering Constantinople, but without so much noise.